Friday, 12 September 2014

Full Prepared Text of Obama’s Speech on ISIS Plans



September 10, 2014

Remarks of President Barack Obama
Address to the Nation
September 10, 2014
Washington, D.C.

As Prepared for Delivery

My fellow Americans – tonight, I want to speak to you about what the United States will do with our friends and allies to degrade and ultimately destroy the terrorist group known as ISIL.

As Commander-in-Chief, my highest priority is the security of the American people. Over the last several years, we have consistently taken the fight to terrorists who threaten our country. We took out Osama bin Laden and much of al Qaeda’s leadership in Afghanistan and Pakistan. We’ve targeted al Qaeda’s affiliate in Yemen, and recently eliminated the top commander of its affiliate in Somalia. We’ve done so while bringing more than 140,000 American troops home from Iraq, and drawing down our forces in Afghanistan, where our combat mission will end later this year. Thanks to our military and counterterrorism professionals, America is safer.


President Barack Obama delivers a prime-time address on military action against Islamic State militants. European Pressphoto Agency
Still, we continue to face a terrorist threat. We cannot erase every trace of evil from the world, and small groups of killers have the capacity to do great harm. That was the case before 9/11, and that remains true today. That’s why we must remain vigilant as threats emerge. At this moment, the greatest threats come from the Middle East and North Africa, where radical groups exploit grievances for their own gain. And one of those groups is ISIL – which calls itself the “Islamic State.”

Now let’s make two things clear: ISIL is not “Islamic.” No religion condones the killing of innocents, and the vast majority of ISIL’s victims have been Muslim. And ISIL is certainly not a state. It was formerly al Qaeda’s affiliate in Iraq, and has taken advantage of sectarian strife and Syria’s civil war to gain territory on both sides of the Iraq-Syrian border. It is recognized by no government, nor the people it subjugates. ISIL is a terrorist organization, pure and simple. And it has no vision other than the slaughter of all who stand in its way.

In a region that has known so much bloodshed, these terrorists are unique in their brutality. They execute captured prisoners. They kill children. They enslave, rape, and force women into marriage. They threatened a religious minority with genocide. In acts of barbarism, they took the lives of two American journalists – Jim Foley and Steven Sotloff.

So ISIL poses a threat to the people of Iraq and Syria, and the broader Middle East – including American citizens, personnel and facilities. If left unchecked, these terrorists could pose a growing threat beyond that region – including to the United States. While we have not yet detected specific plotting against our homeland, ISIL leaders have threatened America and our allies. Our intelligence community believes that thousands of foreigners – including Europeans and some Americans – have joined them in Syria and Iraq. Trained and battle-hardened, these fighters could try to return to their home countries and carry out deadly attacks.

More In ISIS
10 Takeaways From Obama's Speech
Reaction to Obama Speech a Preview of Debate to Come
Rand Paul Sounds Cautious Notes After Obama's ISIS Speech
Jay Carney Debates John McCain After Obama Speech
Inside the Speech: Obama's New ISIS Strategy
I know many Americans are concerned about these threats. Tonight, I want you to know that the United States of America is meeting them with strength and resolve. Last month, I ordered our military to take targeted action against ISIL to stop its advances. Since then, we have conducted more than 150 successful airstrikes in Iraq. These strikes have protected American personnel and facilities, killed ISIL fighters, destroyed weapons, and given space for Iraqi and Kurdish forces to reclaim key territory. These strikes have helped save the lives of thousands of innocent men, women and children.

But this is not our fight alone. American power can make a decisive difference, but we cannot do for Iraqis what they must do for themselves, nor can we take the place of Arab partners in securing their region. That’s why I’ve insisted that additional U.S. action depended upon Iraqis forming an inclusive government, which they have now done in recent days. So tonight, with a new Iraqi government in place, and following consultations with allies abroad and Congress at home, I can announce that America will lead a broad coalition to roll back this terrorist threat.

Our objective is clear: we will degrade, and ultimately destroy, ISIL through a comprehensive and sustained counter-terrorism strategy.

First, we will conduct a systematic campaign of airstrikes against these terrorists. Working with the Iraqi government, we will expand our efforts beyond protecting our own people and humanitarian missions, so that we’re hitting ISIL targets as Iraqi forces go on offense. Moreover, I have made it clear that we will hunt down terrorists who threaten our country, wherever they are. That means I will not hesitate to take action against ISIL in Syria, as well as Iraq. This is a core principle of my presidency: if you threaten America, you will find no safe haven.

Second, we will increase our support to forces fighting these terrorists on the ground. In June, I deployed several hundred American service members to Iraq to assess how we can best support Iraqi Security Forces. Now that those teams have completed their work – and Iraq has formed a government – we will send an additional 475 service members to Iraq. As I have said before, these American forces will not have a combat mission – we will not get dragged into another ground war in Iraq. But they are needed to support Iraqi and Kurdish forces with training, intelligence and equipment. We will also support Iraq’s efforts to stand up National Guard Units to help Sunni communities secure their own freedom from ISIL control.

Across the border, in Syria, we have ramped up our military assistance to the Syrian opposition. Tonight, I again call on Congress to give us additional authorities and resources to train and equip these fighters. In the fight against ISIL, we cannot rely on an Assad regime that terrorizes its people; a regime that will never regain the legitimacy it has lost. Instead, we must strengthen the opposition as the best counterweight to extremists like ISIL, while pursuing the political solution necessary to solve Syria’s crisis once and for all.

Third, we will continue to draw on our substantial counterterrorism capabilities to prevent ISIL attacks. Working with our partners, we will redouble our efforts to cut off its funding; improve our intelligence; strengthen our defenses; counter its warped ideology; and stem the flow of foreign fighters into – and out of – the Middle East. And in two weeks, I will chair a meeting of the UN Security Council to further mobilize the international community around this effort.

Fourth, we will continue providing humanitarian assistance to innocent civilians who have been displaced by this terrorist organization. This includes Sunni and Shia Muslims who are at grave risk, as well as tens of thousands of Christians and other religious minorities. We cannot allow these communities to be driven from their ancient homelands.

This is our strategy. And in each of these four parts of our strategy, America will be joined by a broad coalition of partners. Already, allies are flying planes with us over Iraq; sending arms and assistance to Iraqi Security Forces and the Syrian opposition; sharing intelligence; and providing billions of dollars in humanitarian aid. Secretary Kerry was in Iraq today meeting with the new government and supporting their efforts to promote unity, and in the coming days he will travel across the Middle East and Europe to enlist more partners in this fight, especially Arab nations who can help mobilize Sunni communities in Iraq and Syria to drive these terrorists from their lands. This is American leadership at its best: we stand with people who fight for their own freedom; and we rally other nations on behalf of our common security and common humanity.

My Administration has also secured bipartisan support for this approach here at home. I have the authority to address the threat from ISIL. But I believe we are strongest as a nation when the President and Congress work together. So I welcome congressional support for this effort in order to show the world that Americans are united in confronting this danger.

Now, it will take time to eradicate a cancer like ISIL. And any time we take military action, there are risks involved – especially to the servicemen and women who carry out these missions. But I want the American people to understand how this effort will be different from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. It will not involve American combat troops fighting on foreign soil. This counter-terrorism campaign will be waged through a steady, relentless effort to take out ISIL wherever they exist, using our air power and our support for partner forces on the ground. This strategy of taking out terrorists who threaten us, while supporting partners on the front lines, is one that we have successfully pursued in Yemen and Somalia for years. And it is consistent with the approach I outlined earlier this year: to use force against anyone who threatens America’s core interests, but to mobilize partners wherever possible to address broader challenges to international order.

My fellow Americans, we live in a time of great change. Tomorrow marks 13 years since our country was attacked. Next week marks 6 years since our economy suffered its worst setback since the Great Depression. Yet despite these shocks; through the pain we have felt and the grueling work required to bounce back – America is better positioned today to seize the future than any other nation on Earth.

Our technology companies and universities are unmatched; our manufacturing and auto industries are thriving. Energy independence is closer than it’s been in decades. For all the work that remains, our businesses are in the longest uninterrupted stretch of job creation in our history. Despite all the divisions and discord within our democracy, I see the grit and determination and common goodness of the American people every single day – and that makes me more confident than ever about our country’s future.

Abroad, American leadership is the one constant in an uncertain world. It is America that has the capacity and the will to mobilize the world against terrorists. It is America that has rallied the world against Russian aggression, and in support of the Ukrainian peoples’ right to determine their own destiny. It is America – our scientists, our doctors, our know-how – that can help contain and cure the outbreak of Ebola. It is America that helped remove and destroy Syria’s declared chemical weapons so they cannot pose a threat to the Syrian people – or the world – again. And it is America that is helping Muslim communities around the world not just in the fight against terrorism, but in the fight for opportunity, tolerance, and a more hopeful future.

America, our endless blessings bestow an enduring burden. But as Americans, we welcome our responsibility to lead. From Europe to Asia – from the far reaches of Africa to war-torn capitals of the Middle East – we stand for freedom, for justice, for dignity. These are values that have guided our nation since its founding. Tonight, I ask for your support in carrying that leadership forward. I do so as a Commander-in-Chief who could not be prouder of our men and women in uniform – pilots who bravely fly in the face of danger above the Middle East, and service-members who support our partners on the ground.

When we helped prevent the massacre of civilians trapped on a distant mountain, here’s what one of them said. “We owe our American friends our lives. Our children will always remember that there was someone who felt our struggle and made a long journey to protect innocent people.”

That is the difference we make in the world. And our own safety – our own security – depends upon our willingness to do what it takes to defend this nation, and uphold the values that we stand for – timeless ideals that will endure long after those who offer only hate and destruction have been vanquished from the Earth.

May God bless our troops, and may God bless the United States of America.

Thursday, 11 September 2014

Mourinho makes fun of Guardiola's bald head


Is there a better set of enemies in modern soccer than Pep Guardiola and Jose Mourinho?

The Spaniard and Portuguese managers continued their long-standing feud last week at the UEFA coaches summit when they clashed over – of all things – the length of grass on pitches.

According to the UK’s Express, Guardiola reportedly argued that the current length of 3cm was too long, that it should no exceed 1.5cm and that it should be watered before each match. A simple recipe, Guardiola said, to making the game quick and more beautiful.

To this, Mourinho is claimed to have countered: “Everyone has his style of play, which should be respected. Football can be spectacular in several ways.”

To which Guardiola then responded: “The beauty of football depends on the coach. It seems to me that Mourinho prefers the result to the spectacle. I know to him that’s all that matters.”

The spat reportedly ended there but was reignited by Mourinho on Wednesday when German publication Bildquoted him as saying the following: “If you enjoy what you’re doing, you don’t lose your hair. He’s got a bald head. Guardiola doesn’t enjoy football.”

A deep cut from Mourinho, there, and one that seems to imply guys like Arjen Robben and Wayne Rooneyhaven’t been enjoying their football for quite some time now.

In all seriousness, assuming these quotes are correct it’s abundantly clear that this feud has become downright outlandish. As fans we can only sit back, soak in the entertainment and hope that somehow the UEFA Champions League Gods match up Chelsea and Bayern in the Round of 16.

UEFA Confirm Share of City FFP Fine Will Go to Liverpool, Chelsea, and Arsenal



With the Champions League group stages about to get underway, UEFA have finalised plans for how the extra money coming in this season from clubs who violated their financial fair play rules will be divided up. As expected for some time, they have chosen to spread it around amongst all compliant Champions League and Europa League sides.

The result of this finalised decision is that fines paid by Manchester City, Zenit St. Petersburg, and Paris Saint Germain will be divided equally amongst every club in the Champions and Europa Leagues this season that complied with FFP last season. This means that in England, Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal, Tottenham, and Everton all stand to receive additional funds.

It sounds an amusing and potentially effective way to discourage clubs from violating FFP, at least on the surface. However, between the two competitions, there are eighty participants. And the portion of the fines paid out to UEFA this summer—punishments are paid over multiple years and later payments can be avoided by reaching compliance—is around £20M.

Amongst compliant clubs, that means an extra quarter-million pounds when everything is said and done. UEFA can champion the fact that they're giving money back to the clubs, but compared to what's already awarded for making it into Europe, it is a pittance, and certainly not an amount that will cause the likes City to lose sleep over their domestic rivals receiving it.

City, Zenit, and PSG can afford the combined £20M they're paying out this season. And an extra quarter-million or thereabouts to league rivals isn't going to frighten them or put their positions near the top of domestic tables at greater risk. UEFA will be holding meetings in October to determine if there are alterations that could be made to the system, but change seems unlikely.

It shouldn't be, though, and as when their current system was first proposed, the answer seems obvious—fines should, rather than being divided amongst all clubs, be divided only domestically. Rather than giving a pittance to every club playing in Europe this season, give a significant sum to domestic rivals who are in Europe or who might have been if the offender hadn't qualified.

The current approach doesn't offer a real deterrent to the likes of City, Zenit, and PSG. Giving a million pounds or more to each of their nearest rivals domestically just might. It would also do more to compensate those sides that are directly impacted by non-compliance, as it could be weighted towards those whose position in Europe was threatened by a non-compliant side.

In England, it would mean City compensating Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal, Everton, and Tottenham—as well as Manchester United, who missed the Europa League by one spot. Everton would be given a larger sum for missing the Champions League by one spot. Arsenal and Tottenham would have stood to receive more had they failed to make European group play.

Instead, UEFA have set up a system that offers little deterrent value when it comes to big-spending offending clubs like City, Zenit, and PSG. Perhaps the intent is commendable, yet the execution is sorely lacking, providing only the appearance of deterrent for over-spending clubs while doing little that might actually cause them to reconsider their approach.


When should you wash your pants and other clothing?

How often do you wash your clothes and underwear? Do you wear your jeans for a week or even a month before washing it? What about your bed sheets? How long do you use them before soaking them in water? In this post, you will find some recommendations from the American Cleaning Institute for when it’s time to wash sheets, jeans, shirts, socks, underwear, and other items.
When to wash what:















Bed sheets: At least every two weeks, more often if you sweat a lot.
Pajamas: After 3 or 4 wearings (if you shower before bed, you may get a few more).
Towel: After 3 or 4 normal uses or more frequently if you play sports.
Socks and underwear: After each wearing.
Bras: After 2 to 3 wearings.
T-shirts, tank tops and camisoles: After each wearing.
Dress shirts and khakis: Can be worn a few times before washing unless you are sweating or they are visibly dirty.
Jeans: Can typically be worn 3 times before washing.
Leggings: After every wearing to get rid of the baggy knees.
Bathing suits: After every wearing.
Whites and silks: After every wearing because they’re prone to discoloration.

Wednesday, 10 September 2014

Alfred Ajani, Nigerian who employed unsual method in his job search, lands dream job

Alfred Ajani is the guy who employed an unusual method in his job search; he went to a train station and held up a poster to advertise himself to employers.  The 22-year-old took the approach after he had applied for more than 300 jobs and his approach has finally paid off. One of the people who saw him holding up the sign has given him a job. he has been given a marketing role at a recruiting agency, the Asoria Group.-, whichis a few meters from the spot where he stood to  advertise himself.



Ajani said: 'The director walked past me when he saw me that morning, but later got in contact through [the website] LinkedIn. The company said they were looking for someone with out of the box ideas and so they were keen to get me in.' He added: 'The job is one I wouldn't have got if I hadn't gone to the station that morning, so I advise anyone out there who is in the same position I was to think of more direct ways to speak to employers.'



Alfred's new colleagues made special T-shirts with his photo on them to welcome him on his first day at work.


President Jonathan Orders Removal Of Bring Back Jonathan Signs

President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan has directed that the #Bring Back Jonathan 2015 signs and banners around Abuja which he and many Nigerians find offensive and repugnant be brought down immediately.

President Jonathan wholly shares the widely expressed view that the signs which were put up without his knowledge or approval are a highly insensitive parody of the #Bring Back Our Girls hash tag.

While President Jonathan appreciates the enthusiastic show of support for his administration by a broad range of stakeholders, he condemns the #Bring Back Jonathan 2015 signs which appear to make light of the very serious national and global concern for the abducted Chibok girls.

The President assures all Nigerians and the international community that his administration remains fully engaged with efforts to rescue the abducted girls and that he will not knowingly promote any actions that will fly in the face of the seriousness of their plight and the anguish of their families.


Reuben Abati
Special Adviser to the President
(Media & Publicity)
September 10, 2014

Goodluck Jonathan's controversial hashtag


With over 200 schoolgirls abducted in April still missing, many Nigerians are outraged that the #BringBackOurGirls hashtag is being adapted as a political slogan for President Goodluck Jonathan's re-election.
In one sense, you can understand what the president's supporters were thinking. The #BringBackOurGirls hashtag, calling for 200 school girls abducted by Boko Haram militants in April, became one of the world's biggest ever social media campaigns. So why not borrow the slogan for the president's re-election campaign?
The hashtag #BringBackGoodluck2015 seems to have first been used on Twitter by a group campaigning on behalf of the president. On 30th August, they tweeted: "There is no vacancy in Aso rock [the president's palace] we want Goodluck Jonathan again #NigeriansDemand #BringBackJonathan2015." It is unclear whether it has been officially endorsed but it has been widely used on printed banners at campaigning events across the country.
But the slogan seems to represent a dramatic misreading of Nigeria's public mood. The abducted school girls are still held captive, despite repeated promises by the government - and President Jonathan himself - to secure their release. So far, the government has not taken military steps to rescue the girls, arguing that if force is used to rescue them, they may end up being killed by the militants.
There's now a major backlash against the hashtag, as people have taken to Twitter to label it as insensitive. It has appeared more than 1,500 times in the last 24 hours, and the vast majority been used to criticise the slogan.
"That hashtag is not only inappropriate but it is insultingly silly. And it is bereft of any political tact," said one. Another said the slogan's inventor "has the combined IQ of 500 frogs. Why not coin another hashtag?". "I didn't realize Boko Haram had kidnapped the President!" said a third.
Japheth Omojuwa, a columnist at Nigerian newspaper Punch, told BBC Trending that he felt the decision to use the slogan was "absurd".
"They are using variation of our hashtag #BringBackOurGirls to campaign for the president," he said. "These are people that failed to secure the release of these girls over 150 days since their kidnap."
Terrorist attacks carried out by Boko Haram are still rife in the country. Research by Amnesty International suggests at least 2,000 people have been killed as a result of the conflict this year.